Geekin’ out: 5D vs. 5d II vs. 1Ds II noise comparison…

Geekin’ out: 5D vs. 5d II vs. 1Ds II noise comparison…

I recently went to the 5D Mark II for various reasons, and will begin a series of posts reviewing the camera, as well as showing comparisons between what I have been working with: the 5D and the 1Ds MarkII.  This first comparison is on the image noise that each camera produces at different ISO speeds.  This is of particular interest to photographers in the development of the new 5D Mark II, as it goes a total of 3 stops beyond the top ISO of both the other cameras I’ve personally been using, and the noise reduction has been significantly increased making it more possible to shoot in low-light situations (indoor receptions, etc.) without having to use flash while still producing acceptable image quality.  Although it is not completely without noise at the higher ISO range, it is fair to say that I have felt comfortable shooting at ISO 3200 for events where the images will not be printed larger than A3 (13″x19″).  I haven’t tested the prints, but I am making an educated guess based off the below results and what I’ve seen printed from both of the other cameras.  Feel free to comment, make observations, and add details overlooked.

As to the mechanics: no color correction has been added to any of these shots.  They were all captured on a tripod at the exact same location (although the 1Ds is taller and so the angle is from slightly higher than the other two cameras), and each camera was shot in Manual mode on Auto White Balance at an aperture of 6.3, using the Canon EF 85mm 1.2L lens.  Each photo is at 100% so the viewer gets the full feel of the image up close and personal.  The last image at 3200 might suggest to the viewer that the 5D is perhaps the best image.  It should however be taken into account that the 5D Mark II file is nearly twice its size, thus if the 5D image were blown up to the size of the 5D Mark II it would be grainier and noisier.  To view each of the images without the 100% crop I’ve included a gallery at the bottom for viewing each individual image.  The last thing about the images I’ll say is that no noise reduction was used in camera, an only the default amount from Lightroom 2 was applied.  They were captured as raw files and then converted to .jpgs, so there has been no sharpening applied either.

100compareat ISO 100

400compareat ISO 400

800compareat ISO 800

1250compareat ISO 1250

1600compareat ISO 1600

3200compareat ISO 3200

by Joel

show hide 1 comment

February 28, 2009 - 11:52 pm

Amy P - I think you are having more fun with this house than Espen is! We have it too and I hear toilets flushing all day long. :)

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*

There was an error submitting your comment. Please try again.